Contact Us

Use the form on the right to contact us.

You can edit the text in this area, and change where the contact form on the right submits to, by entering edit mode using the modes on the bottom right. 

         

123 Street Avenue, City Town, 99999

(123) 555-6789

email@address.com

 

You can set your address, phone number, email and site description in the settings tab.
Link to read me page with more information.

Feed

Filtering by Tag: Jesuits

Twitter: The New Arbiter of Orthodoxy in the Catholic Church

Vox Catholica

The Catholic Church has been in a Crisis for some time now. Ever since Vatican II and the new doctrine of “Collegiality” the Church has been split into two factions: Conservative and Progressive. While this dialectical mode of policy making has been common within the world of politics for hundreds of years, it is truly Revolutionary within the Church.

Vatican II

No longer does the practice and teaching of the Church stem from the unchanging and immutable Deposit of Faith. It has been replaced by the Hegelian dialectic of Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis. By the de-throning of Christ the King and the elevating of the “consensus of Bishops” as a teaching authority, the Papacy has effectively lost it’s ability to govern the Church as a sovereign Monarch would govern his nation.

To further the confusion, according to Vatican II, progress comes about through the contemplation of the Faith by believers “who ponder these things in their hearts,” and then demand changes of the pastors and bishops of the Church, effectively inverting the hierarchy of Church governance away from those ministers ordained by God to Teach, Sanctify and Govern.

With this mindset from Vatican II, and the current mindset of the 2018 Synod on the Youth, some have said that this is an opportunity for the laity to make it known to the sacred pastors of the Church that we want Tradition back and to do away with the novelties of Modernism and heterodoxy. But there is a serious problem with this.

In the modern age, the public square has moved away from the Real World, and into the Digital World of Facebook, Twitter, Google and other Big Tech companies. With this has come the serious prospect of the loss of our voice on these platforms, under the guise of “Hate Speech.”

I regret to relate here that I have become a victim of this kind of censorship, a Digital Martyr if you will, and I have only been Tweeting for less than a week.

Father James Martin S.J.

The hammer came down on @TheVoxCatholica, after two tweets were sent to the Progressive Homosexualist priest Father James Martin S.J. who is actively leading souls to hell and attempting to completely up-root the Churches affirmation of Natural Law with regard to Marriage and human sexuality.

The trouble started after Archbishop Chaput warned the church about using terms like “LGBT” in their official paperwork. This clearly sent father Martin over the edge and prompted this Tweet:

In response to this ABSURDITY, I Tweeted the following to Father Martin:

 
James Martin Tweet 1
James Martin Tweet 2
 

Because of these Tweets, Father Martin promptly “blocked” me from viewing his Twitter feed:

Within minutes of being Blocked by Father Martin, Twitter appointed it’s self the moral arbiter of Orthodoxy within the Catholic Church has decided that my Tweets violated Twitter TOS for “Hateful Conduct.” Now, dear fellow faithful Catholics, what is truly hateful? A Catholic asking a priest to stop leading souls to hell by teaching error and heterodoxy, or a Catholic priest sending people to hell by confirming them in their belief that it is ok to commit “Sins that Cry to Heaven for Vengeance?”

Hateful Conduct

I appealed my temporary suspension with Twitter with the following letter:

I have been accused of violating the “hateful conduct” clause of the Twitter TOS for content that does not legitimately meet this criteria. I simply quote Tweeted one Tweet, and Tweeted at a public figure who is a priest in the Catholic Church and is actively promoting sin and heterodoxy which is dangerous to the eternal souls of Christians everywhere. I did not disparage Fr. Martin based on his sexuality, race etc., and as a Catholic it is my right to criticize things harmful to the faithful under the code of Canon law Section 212. By suspending my account, especially during the 2018 Synod on the Youth, Twitter is interfering in the internal affairs of the Catholic Religion. If father Martin wants to block me, that’s fine - but the views expressed by me in these tweets is the basic orthodox teaching of the Catholic Church and I hope you reinstate my account as soon as possible.

Of course, Twitter did not respond to my appeal, and I was forced to delete my “hateful” Tweets to reinstate my account.

What does this mean? Well, If Pope Francis comes out with a Relatio that is as deficient of Catholic Theology as the Instrumentum Laboris for the 2018 Synod, it's going to be game over for us, at least on the internet. Twitter and other Big Tech firms will be able to suspend accounts, for calling out priests and bishops who are leading souls to hell. This isn't about bigotry or "hate speech." This is about the salvation of souls. Twitter and BigTech could decide to prevent “Catholic Twitter” from speaking the truth, discouraging sin, and letting the leaders of the Church know what we need as faithful Catholics…

The Vox Catholica is not the only Twitter account under fire for “Hate Speech.” Nick Donnelly, a Deacon in England has also been suspended and reported for similar sentiments.

With BigTech and the Fake News Media promoting Sin that Cries to Heaven for Vengeance, as soon as it looks like the Catholic Church has "officially" changed it's stance on the subject, anyone caught protesting this will be labelled and silenced, not only on the internet, but also by groups like the SPLC and other ACTUAL hate groups. We will all become Brian McCall. We will all be at risk of losing our Livelihoods, our reputation etc.

And to complicate the problem even more, what if America adopted some sort of Social Credit program like China? God Forbid the day, when in order to qualify for Tax Exemption, it will be necessary to not just tolerate the terrible sin and perversion of sodomy, but promote it and "celebrate" that sin inside of our Churches… Or else.

Kyrie Eleison...

War On Christmas: Jesuit Priest Spouts Modernist Heresies In New Liberal Propaganda Video

Vox Catholica

Another Christmas, another chance to attack Jesus Christ, and His One True Church. This year, tragically, the culprit happens to be a radical liberal Catholic priest.

Last week, Father Kevin O’Brien, dean of the Jesuit School of Theology at Santa Clara University, recorded a video with the pro-sodomite, pro-abortion, Marxist propaganda website Mic.com in which he proudly declared that there is no such thing as a "War On Christmas", and that the idea of said "war" is just a "distraction".

Right... I guess the following are just "distractions":

Yep, the war on Christmas is totally fake, not real, a figment of our imaginations. It's not like members of a certain “religion of peace” are plowing trucks into Christmas markets, trying to kill as many Christians as they can.

Well, you see, that doesn't count because that's not in America. It's not like we have people in America trying to blow up a subway station because of its Christmas posters...

Maybe, I'm missing something here. Maybe this Father O'Brien makes a good point in his video that is eluding me. It won't hurt to watch it, right?

Wow. Wrong again. That was actually painful to watch. It's like watching somebody try to explain why it's okay to allow his wife to cheat on him. Pathetic.

Let's thoroughly dismantle Father O'Brien's entire premise here, shall we?

"I don't think Jesus would care much about whether we say Merry Christmas or not, because He was not concerned with promoting Himself...

Okay, Father might have a point here. It's true, Jesus wasn't concerned with promoting Himself and frequently told His Apostles not to tell anyone what they had seen [Matthew 17:9Mark 7:36Mark 9:8]. But, Father, there's one obvious caveat you're kind of missing here. Promoting Jesus Christ and His Church is your job, and two-thirds of the verses I just cited specifically state that Christ wanted His Apostles to make known His identity as the Messiah, and the Son of God, after His Resurrection, which in turn would save many from the fires of hell [Mark 16:15-16]. 

Let's continue with Father O'Brien's drivel:

"We have to be careful about the language we use in a pluralistic society like ourselves. Because in it, we encounter people of different "faith traditions". Pope Francis will often speak about a culture of encounter, not confrontation, and this means listening to people and respecting people who are different than us. We listen to them not just simply to be nice, but to learn. He also said, 'Whenever we encounter another person in love, we learn something new about God'."

215uxl.jpg

In other words, Father O'Brien thinks we should refrain from possibly offending heretics and adherents of false religions. And, it's certainly not a good thing to just go around bashing people over the head with your religion, but when push comes to shove, we can't give in to political correctness and social pressures. Right is right, wrong is wrong, and it's not a sin to be charitable. Since when is "admonishing the sinner" something "hateful"? How is "instructing the ignorant" (i.e. non-Catholics) an offensive act?

Confrontation is not always a bad thing. If you take Father O'Brien's (and Pope Francis', for that matter) new doctrine against "confrontation" to its logical conclusion, I guess we should just let Uncle Albert continue to drink himself stupid. It would probably be better if we let sister Jane starve herself to death because she thinks she's fat. And sure, why not let Jack go ahead refashion himself as Jill...

You see? Absurd, unrealistic. This priest is living in La-La land. If we don't confront those who find themselves marching under the banner of the antichrist, in charity for the salvation of their souls, they will most certainly confront us, and they won't be as well-intentioned as we are (see: Islamic Terror AttacksThe HolodomorThe Guillotine/Reign of Terror).

Finally, we move on to the biggest whopper of Fr. O'Brien's propaganda video:

"Now Christians, like any people of faith, need to defend the right to practice their faith in our society, but it's just not about promoting or protecting Christians. If I'm to be called 'Christian' or a good citizen, I need to be as protective of the rights of Muslims, for instance, in this country to practice their faith. I need to be as vigilant to protect their rights in their communities as I do my Christian community."

This. Is. Evil. Through-and-through, pure evil. The scary part is that people are already doing this.

First of all, ask yourself: Are Muslims protective of Christians' rights to practice their religions in their countries?

No. The answer, dear Father O'Brien, is no. 

So if we continue to allow and protect Islam in Western societies with Western birthrates as low as they are, and with Islam growing as fast as it is, we can only be even more assured of the destruction of the Kingship of Christ on earth, and the destruction of the soul, with billions ending up in hell.

You may be asking yourself, "How can someone stray so far from the truth of Catholicism, while still believing that they are Catholic?" The answer is simple: MODERNISM.

What is going on in Father O'Brien's head is Religious Liberty gone wild, mixed with a hefty dose of Freemasonry and the idea of Universal Salvation.

Here's how the error goes:

There is a God, but different people experience Him in different ways. These different experiences amalgamate themselves and manifest in different "faith traditions". Each "faith tradition" is equally valid for each individual, because no two people are exactly the same and people experience one and the same object in different ways. Maybe my red is your blue, and your blue is my red. Since I can't be you, and you can't be me, we can't know if your blue is my red, and my red is your blue. Therefore, differences in religions are nothing to fight about because, ultimately, we're all talking about the same thing. You do your thing, I'll do my thing, and neither of our things are better than the other; so I'll respect you and you'll respect me, and live happily ever after.

For Father O'Brien and his ilk, it is not absurd to believe that there are about as many "faiths" as there are genders (hint: we're talking more than 2 here). This, of course, is preposterous and completely against the Catholic religion, which is the true religion of God, and the only religion whose mysteries are truly unfathomable by man. This is so because they weren't created by man, which means we must have supernatural faith to believe what our finite minds cannot fully grasp: One God, Three Persons. Father. Son. Holy Ghost.

We do not get to choose what is true, and what is not. We do not get to define reality. We cannot pick and choose what to believe and what to reject, and it is certainly impossible to claim that man has the liberty to choose his own religion, according to his own personal inclinations.

As a matter of fact, this whole concept has already been condemned for quite some time. Take, for example, this erroneous statement, condemned by Pope Leo XIII:

[The State] is bound to grant equal right to every creed, so that the public order may not be disturbed by any particular form of religious belief. And it is a part of this theory that all questions that concern religion are to be referred to private judgement; that everyone is to be free to follow whatever religion he prefers..." - [Immortale Dei]

Or this one, from Gregory XVI:

"We now come to another and most fruitful cause of the evils which at present afflict the Church and which We so bitterly deplore; We mean indifferentism, or that fatal opinion everywhere diffused by the craft of the wicked, that men can by the profession of any faith obtain the eternal salvation of their souls, provided their life conforms to justice and probity...

"From this poisoned source of indifferentism flows that false and absurd or rather extravagant, maxim that liberty of conscience should be established and guaranteed to each man" - [Mirari Vos]

Or yet another condemned statement, this one denounced by Blessed Pius IX:

"... the liberty of conscience and of worship is the peculiar (or inalienable) right of every man."

"[This right] must be proclaimed and guaranteed by law in every properly constituted society." - [Quanta Cura]

Father O'Brien, dean of a theological school, is so rife with Modernism, Liberalism and error, I'm surprised he can tell the difference between his shirt and his pants. And to make matters worse, he isn't even calling just for the liberty to choose your own religion. He is asking us to actively defend, protect and help propagate what we know to be a false religion, concocted by a man named Mohammed, whose "god" is the devil.

If you've made it this far into the article, without getting triggered, or succumbing to ADHD and clicking over to another site, I must ask you to pray for this poor priest, Father Kevin O'Brien. And when you're done with that, arm yourself with the truth about the false notion of Religious Liberty.